data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d407/4d407b033218f11b7c90b4e2ba666e2a8efbb1ff" alt=""
Phase 1: 403 Bleecker St., Marc by Marc Jacobs Womenswear
Phase 2: 385 Bleecker St., Marc Jacobs Collection Accessories (as of last week)
Phase 3: 382 Bleecker St., Little Marc Jacobs (childrenswear)
Phase 4: 400 Bleecker St., Bookmarc (books...maybe?)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcc72/bcc72bb0507f13c1dea8ea567276b49bd06c12d5" alt=""
Which arises some questions: Is MJ only interested in making tons (and tons and tons) of money whether it be from 500 $2 keychains or 1 $1,000 purse? Is he not interested in who the MJ customer is as long as he/she is buying his merchandise? Or is he simply interested in making everyone a Marc Jacobs customer? I suppose we'll just have to sit back and where the Jacobian empire expands to next.
A quick word about the Biography Books. They haven't closed but simply moved to another location further East on Bleecker. After being a neighborhood staple for nearly 25 years, I find it sad that rents are being raised so high that important local joints characteristic of the neighborhood can't keep up. Leaving only multi-million dollar companies to snatch up the space. Can we be angry with companies such as Marc Jacobs for small more special business being forced to relocate or even worse, close down completely? (don't remind me of Florent, may it rest in peace) Or are they simply taking advantage of real estate no one else can afford? After all, they aren't responsible for the rise in rent prices, they're just the only ones who can pay it ... right? Apparently the Observer was quoted as saying "the new tenants at the former Biography Bookshop can look forward to paying eight times the lease owners Chuck and Carolyn Epstein signed ten years ago," on a street where some retailers are paying $80,000 per month. For a more, shall we say... negative take on the situation (but with some good points) read this.
Although I may be a little hesitant about the idea of Bookmarc based off principle, that doesn't mean to say that some of the merchandise I've seen thus far is, well, quite cheeky and quite irresistible (see pictures below). I agree with the Racked NY article in saying "well, I don't hate it".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e44a1/e44a11c7129607216f84067df73fe937ea938776" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9866c/9866c1181a50fd2e624e5ed70a5e0c7f0b4b601d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eddb5/eddb51fba27796ee424053f44c9727b0faa9d1b8" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment